She is posting all this nonsense about Lefebvre that was spread by Bishop Louis Vezelis.
Just remember, if the logic of Bishop Louis Vezelis holds true, then his ordination is as doubtful or more doubtful than that of Archerbishop Marcel Lefebvre:
Bishop Louis Vezelis was ordained by Cardinal Paul-Emile Leger:
Cardinal Paul-Emile Leger who was a leading liberal force at the Second Vatican Council,
He supported religious liberty at the Council.
He was one of the Council Fathers who, in a speech delivered on 29 October 1964 concerning the document later promulgated as the Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, Gaudium et Spes, raised the question of a possible change in the Church's teaching on birth control. In the same speech, he urged that the document place more emphasis on conjugal love as an end or purpose of marriage.
To Cardinal Leger the Vatican II declaration on Jews was all-important. The Canadian cardinal called it a necessary act of the Church’s renewal. He labeled unfortunate the fact that it is not stated explicitly that the Jewish people were not guilty of deicide. https://vaticaniiat50.wordpress.com/2014/09/28/north-american-cardinals-urge-strong-statement-on-jewish-relations/
Consider the following:
"In 1991, Canadian Cardinal Eduard Gagnon who was an advisor to both Pope Paul VI and John Paul II on the true nature of Freemasonry stated unambiguously 'Anglo-Masonry is no less anti-religious than the French [Grand-Orient] version... it is obvious that the attitude is very anti-Catholic.' (30 DAYS, April 1991)
I would not "hook my star" on anyone other than Jesus Christ. I am not going to presume to judge who has more "connection to heaven" than another.
I would not "bet my salvation" on anything.
think about what was said above, the same type of things were said by the followers of Jim Jones!
Careful of drinking the Kool-aid: