Follow by Email

Monday, June 24, 2013



"So are we now the enemy?"

The media wants you to focus on Edward Snowden's character and his flight for safety, while ignoring the real issue: if telling the American people they are being illegally spied on millions of times daily is "aiding the enemy," have we become the government's enemy?


"Think about it!"

 

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Could there be anything more twisted than these Holocaust fantasists? How more and more people are making up memoirs about witnessing Nazi crimes

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2346193/Could-twisted-holocaust-fantasists-How-people-making-memoirs-witnessing-Nazi-crimes.html

Just four days before the end of the war in Europe, a unit of Canadian soldiers was advancing through a thick forest in the north-east of Holland. Accompanying them was a member of the highly secret British Special Service Unit, a man called Joe Corry.

By any measure, Corry had had an eventful war. He had assassinated a Nazi scientist with a crossbow, watched D-Day from a house on the landing beaches, rescued the nuclear scientist J Robert Oppenheimer (the so-called father of the atom bomb) from Holland, attached limpet mines to U-boats, been shipwrecked off Newfoundland, and had even worked with the future James Bond author, Ian Fleming, himself an intelligence officer.

But despite everything he had seen, nothing could prepare Corry for what he would witness that day. For hidden deep in the forest was a Nazi ‘experimental’ extermination camp, the sight of which would remain with him for ever.

‘The living and dead evidence of horror and brutality beyond one’s imagination was there,’ wrote Corry years later. ‘People were lying, crawling and shuffling about, in stinking ankle-deep mud and human excrement.’

A young girl came up to him, crying for help, but there was little that Corry could do. A rabbi then approached and kissed the back of Corry’s hand, mumbling what Corry could only assume was a prayer.


As Corry walked around the camp, he was presented with increasingly horrific sights, including heaps of corpses and rows of ‘living skeletons’ crammed into blockhouses. 

A few days later he returned, and saw two inmates tearing flesh from a long-dead horse and ‘gulping huge bites’.

What Corry saw that day nearly seven decades ago was an all-too-vivid example of the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were murdered on the orders of Adolf Hitler. 

No wonder that earlier this year publishers Simon & Schuster

The new edition, out in 2014, has been described by Corry’s editor as ‘everything you’d want to read in a World War II memoir — it’s a gripping, rollercoaster account of extreme bravery and resourcefulness, that also packs a powerful and emotional punch’.

There is, however, just one problem: it simply isn’t true. 

There were no such ‘experimental extermination camps’ in Holland, and the concentration camps that had been on Dutch soil had been discovered well before May 4 — the day of the German surrender in Holland.


In fact, nearly everything Corry claims about his wartime experiences is fictitious. There was no ‘Special Service Unit’; Professor Oppenheimer was in the U.S. throughout the war; there were no British troops hiding in houses on the D-Day beaches.


The reality is that all of these stories are bovine excrement! Ever meet an American WWII Vet that claimed he was there to liberate a death camp - if so - you KNOW you met a liar - you see - the Americans never liberated a single "death ca...mp" - they were all liberated by the Soviets - with the exception of one supposedly by the British. Ever see the pics of the emaciated prisoners that the American soldiers brought home - they where handed out to them by commanding officers! The memorial at Auschwitz used to read that 4 million Jews were put to death there - but in the 1990's they changed the plaque to say that nearly 1 million were killed there - but yet they still say that a total of 6 million were killed - how does that work? The entire story is bovine excrement.

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Putin: First Soviet government was mostly Jewish

http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-News/Putin-First-Soviet-government-was-mostly-Jewish-317150

Russian president says predominantly Jewish Soviet government was guided by false ideological considerations.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government were Jewish.

“I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center....



There was a time when this statement of fact would have been considered a "conspiracy theory" or "anti-semitism" - but the bottom line is that Communism is a Jewish invention and that the Jewish Soviet government brutally murdered over 20 million Christians! Now ask yourself why they keep wagging the holohoax in your face - and then realize that all of the so-called "death camps" were liberated by Jewish Soviets who projected their crimes on the Germans and made themselves out to be the victims - when in reality they were the perpetrators!

Monday, June 17, 2013

I have long suspected that the Koch brothers - billionaire neocons who pay off politicians throughout the nation - and the big supporters of Scott Walker and Paul Ryan were Jewish - but I never found strong evidence of this.  I know that one of the brothers is a huge promoter of the theory of evolution and even mocks God with a portrait of a monkey in the place of God reaching his finger toward man.  He is also a supporter of homosexual perverts.

But today I came upon strong evidence - if not proof that they are Jews:

The Top Jewish Donors and Jewish Giving: Why the Disconnect?

http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/the-top-jewish-donors-and-jewish-giving-why-the-disconnect/

by Robert Evans and Avrum Lapin

The list of the 60 top charitable contributions in 2008 includes some remarkable gifts. They totaled $15.78 billion, up from a cumulative total of $7.79 billion in 2007, which was the best year ever for recorded charitable giving in the United States. That said, we wonder aloud how the Jewish donors on the list are making their Jewish charitable decisions and why their giving has not been directed for Jewish priorities.

In fact, of the donors identified on the just-released Slate 60/Chronicle of Philanthropy listing, 16 of the individuals highlighted are either Jewish by birth or affiliation. Prominent on the updated annual list are Leona Helmsley, whose $5 billion estate was settled in 2008 and represented the single largest charitable gift in 2008. Other Jewish donors included New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, Stephen Schwartzman, David Koch, and Eli Broad, all of whom who made a place of prominence on the list of the most charitable Americans along with Henry Kravis, Ronald Perelman, Stewart and Linda Resnick, Sheldon Adelson, Andrew Tisch, and Peter Lewis. - See more at: http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/the-top-jewish-donors-and-jewish-giving-why-the-disconnect/#sthash.hz9tH431.dpuf

Friday, June 07, 2013



This is hysterical - these neo-con whores for Israel now pretend that they did not realize that the Patriot Act would lead to what we know have - the complete surveillance of everyone in America!





These zio-trash neocons now want to blame everything on Obama - both parties are in this together!

Thursday, June 06, 2013

Vegetarians May Live Longer

http://healthland.time.com/2013/06/04/vegetarians-may-live-longer/#ixzz2VR5SEy8g

In one of the largest studies to date, researchers from Loma Linda University in California report that vegetarians outlast meat eaters.

Among a group of 70,000 participants, researchers determined that vegetarians had a 12% lower risk of death compared with nonvegetarians. The effect held true for other specific vegetarian diets, according to the study, which is published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. For instance, vegans also had a lower risk of death compared to nonvegetarians.



I love this sentence: "Among a group of 70,000 participants, researchers determined that vegetarians had a 12% lower risk of death compared with nonvegetarians.: - hmmm - last I heard we all have a 100% risk of death! What these "studies" miss is the obvious fact that most all "vegetarians" are "health nuts" - in other words they exercise and eat right all around - whereas the meat eaters include the majority of people who are sedentary and eat like crap. Also all the studies about red meat being so bad for you are including meats preserved with sodium nitrate - the real culprit in heart disease - it is not the meat - it is what we add to the meat!
We also know that there are studies that show the vegetarian and vegan diets are not healthy at all:

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/eating-vegan-diet-bad-for-your-heart

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,422767,00.html

 but when it comes down to it for Catholics - the Church has spoken:

Creed of the Council of Toledo - AD400

"If anyone says or believes that the flesh of birds or of animals, which has been given for food, not only ought to be abstained from for the chastising of the body, but ought to be abhorred, let him be anathema"


also from the Council of Pelegius - AD 579-590

"If anyone considers the foods of the flesh unclean, which God has given for the use of men; and not for the affliction of his body, but as if he thought it unclean, so abstains from these that he does not taste vegetables cooked with meats, just as Manichaeus and Priscillian have said, let him be anathema"

These two councils clearly state that anyone who thinks that eating meat should be abhorred (due to hurting the poor little animals) or that it is bad for your health in and of itself are "anathema" - separated from God and His Church.


 

Wednesday, June 05, 2013







Do not be deceived by this - DNA evidence can be fabricated and used to frame anyone!


This is more proof that we are not a free country!


DNA evidence can be fabricated and planted at crime scenes, scientists warn
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1207389/DNA-evidence-fabricated-planted-crime-scenes-scientists-warn.html


Scientists have shown it is possible to fake DNA evidence, potentially undermining the credibility of the key forensic technique.

Using equipment found in labs up and down the country, they obliterated all traces of DNA from a blood sample and added someone else's genetic material in its place.

The swap was so successful it fooled scientists who carry out DNA fingerprinting for U.S. courts.


The development raises the possibility of samples of blood or saliva being planted at crime scenes, leading to the innocent being wrongly convicted and the guilty going free.

Israeli researcher Dan Frumkin, who produced the bogus DNA, said: 'If you can fake blood, saliva or any other tissue, you can engineer a crime scene. Any biology undergraduate could perform this.'

Dr Frumkin's company, which has made a kit he claims can distinguish real DNA samples from fake ones, used two techniques to fabricate the evidence.

In the first, they extracted minute samples of genetic material from strands of hair and multiplied them many times over.

They then inserted this DNA into blood cells that had been purged of all genetic clues to their real owner.

The blood then contained the genetic fingerprint of the first person, the journal Forensic Science International: Genetics reports.

In theory, it could then be planted at the scene of a crime.

 
DNA material can be gathered from an empty wine glass or cigarette butt

Hair, chewing gum, cigarette butts and mugs and glasses could all provide an initial DNA sample...


Who needs that - the cops can now take a sample for anything that they deem a serious crime!