Follow by Email

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Will we ever know the truth regarding WWII, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party?

I am currently reading an excellent book by James and Suzanne Pool (brother and sister) entitled, Who Financed Hilter, the Secret Funding of Hitler's Rise to Power 1919-1933.

This book sparked some interest in me to look a little more into the situation and to attempt to find the truth.

When Hitler began his political career the situation in Germany was unimaginable.  The German mark was trading against the US Dollar at over a trillion to one.  The population of Germany was starving to death, unemployment was universal and Communists were seizing key cities and provinces. 

Adolf Hitler took as a mission in life to destroy Communism.  The strong Jewish support of Communism was one of the primary reasons for Hitler's issues with Jews.  The Bolshevik revolution was led and financed by wealthy Jews, this is a historical fact.  Karl Marx was Jewish, Trotsky, Stalin, and Lenin  were Jews:,8599,2077413,00.html,7340,L-3342999,00.html

As I began to read this book, I was a bit surprised that it seemed to be a reasonably unbiased report of the facts.  There were many facts in this book that I was not aware of that sparked my interest to do a little more research.

Henry Ford was a very strong supporter of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party as was Charles Lindbergh, both very famous and intelligent Americans.

Here are a few quotes from this book that gave me pause to think:

"In 1923, when the Nazi Party was in need of a new and larger headquarters, Richard Frank tried to help Hitler raise the money.  Together they went to see Dr. Kuhlo.  If Frank was willing to pledge a certain sum of money as initial security for the venture, Dr. Kuhlo said he would try to form a syndicate with a few other public minded businessmen to buy the Hotel Eden located near the station.  The owners were demanding Swiss francs in payment, but within a surprisingly short time they financial arrangements were made and Hitler was invited to a meeting of the syndicate in the plush boardroom of a prominent Munich firm.  As the chairman of the syndicate, Dr. Kuhlo stood up and said he was pleased to announce that the hotel would be put at the Party's disposal for a modest fee.  He then went on to suggest casually that the Party might suppress its program's article against Freemasonry.  "I got up and said goodbye to these kindly philanthropists," Hitler recalled.  "I'd fallen unaware into a nest of Freemasons!...It's by means of these continual blackmailings that they succeed in acquiring the subterranean power that acts in all sectors."

This next quote is quite amazing, King Edward VIII, King of England and Duke of Windsor was forced to abdicate his throne, due to his support of Hitler.

From the same above mentioned book:

"Legend has it that Edward was compelled to abdicate due to his refusal to give up "the woman he loved", (this is absurd, they claim he had to abdicate the throne because he wanted to marry a divorced woman and that was against the Church - hello! Henry VIII?)  However, this issue was used as a facade to conceal the more critical objection which the government had with the King - namely, his pro-Nazi attitudes.  Evidence is found in both English and German sources.  A memorandum from Ribbentrop to Hitler dated January 2, 1938, stated the following: "National Socialism, however, is thought capable of anything.  Baldwin already apprehended this and Edward VIII had to abdicate, since it was not certain whether, because of his views, he would cooperate in an anti-German policy" (remember WWII did not start until September of 1939 - yet already in the beginning of 1938, England was bent on an anti-German policy to the point of forcing their King to abdicate the throne!)

Hermann Goring was certain that Edward VIII had lost his throne because he wanted an Anglo-German agreement and did not share his government's disdain for the Nazis.  The so-called unsuitable selection of Mrs. Simpson for his wife was only a pretext to get rid of him, according to Goring.  Hitler thought the "real reason for the destruction of the Duke of Windsor was his speech at the old veteran's rally in Berlin, at which he declared that it would be the task of his life to effect a reconciliation between Britain and Germany."  Anthony Eden, the Foreign Secretary, was reported to have said that if King Edward continued to speak independently on foreign affairs, there were "ways and means of compelling him to abdicate" Hugh Dalton, a Labor M.P. mentioned "the widespread rumors that he (The King) was unduly sympathetic to the German Nazis, and a general feeling, that, for a constitutional monarch, he was inclined to hold and express some dangerous personal views."  The Duke affirmed the suspicions that he looked with admiration upon the Nazis when he spoke at a meeting in Leipzig, Germany, in the fall of 1937.  The former king told his audiences: "I have traveled the world and my upbringing has made me familiar with the great achievements of mankind, but that which I have seen in Germany, I have hitherto believed to be impossible.  It cannot be grasped, and is a miracle; one can only begin to understand it when one realizes that behind it all is one man and one will, Adolf Hitler."

There are many interesting facts in this book that I have never heard before and would recommend this book to anyone interested in the history of WWII.  Just to clarify, this book is by no means a pro-Nazi book.

In the last few months I have been looking into things regarding the Nazi's and specifically Adolf Hitler and what I found is amazing.  Here are a few issues that you can consider:

On the issue of abortion - we find that virtually every "pro-life" group claims that the Nazis and Hitler were pro-abortion or allude to the so-called "holocaust" in their literature.

But, we find this from the pro-abortion side:

"Hitler himself, and the Nazi doctrine he created, were unequivocally opposed to any individual right to abortion." Gloria Steinem (Ms., Oct. 1980)

From history we know this:

In 1936 Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler created a Reich Central Office for the Combating of Homosexuality and Abortion: Special Office (II S), a subdepartment of Executive Department II of the Gestapo.

In Nazi Germany, abortion was strictly prohibited.  Abortion was declared an act against the state; the death penalty was introduced in 1943. Under the previous regime, the Weimar Republic, birth control information had been widely disseminated. In 1933, birth control centres were closed and the advertising of contraceptives stopped. Women were encouraged not to work and financial incentives were introduced to encourage childbearing.

Hitler linked abortion and homosexuality as both being horrible evils:

Soon after taking office on January 30, 1933, Hitler banned all homosexual and lesbian organizations. Brownshirted storm troopers raided the institutions and gathering places of homosexuals.   The perverted homosexual subculture had flourished in the relative freedom of the 1920s, in the pubs and cafes of Berlin, Hamburg, Munich, Bremen, and other cities.

Yet we continually find "christian" and "pro-life" groups accusing the Nazi's of being pro-choice and anti-christian.

It seems that Hitler is held up as the "bad guy" no matter which side of an issue one takes.  Here is another example regarding Labor Unions.

On one hand you have the liberals accusing an anti-union communists like Scott Walker in Wisconsin of acting like Hitler when he ended collective bargaining.

But what is the reality? 

When Hitler came to power, he moved to correct this hyperinflation while keeping his national socialist views front and center. In 1933, the Nazis disbanded the Weimar unions and replaced them with the new and improved union, the German Labor Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF), which was comprised of 2 primary entities, the National Socialist Factory Organization and the National Socialist Trade and Industry Organization. The labor contracts that were Weimar contracts were now DAF-honored contracts. The Nazi’s funded the DAF’s coffers with the Weimar unions’ stockpile of wealth (the existing unions were part of that inflation problem). One of the new unions’ most popular programs was the Strength through Joy (Kraft durch Freude, KdF)) program, which developed the KdF-wagen, that later became the Volkswagen, or People’s Car...

Hitler gave the unions their long-awaited demand, one that the Weimar unions were never able to pull off, a National Labor Day, May 1, 1933. source

How about Hitler's own words:
“Bless now our fight for our freedom; the fight we wage for our German people and Fatherland.” – Adolf Hitler, May 1, 1933
"I think that I have already answered the first question adequately. In the present state of affairs I am convinced that we cannot possibly dispense with the trades unions. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions in the economic life of the nation. Not only are they important in the sphere of social policy but also, and even more so, in the national political sphere. For when the great masses of a nation see their vital needs satisfied through a just trade unionist movement the stamina of the whole nation in its struggle for existence will be enormously reinforced thereby.

Before everything else, the trades unions are necessary as building stones for the future economic parliament, which will be made up of chambers representing the various professions and occupations."  Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

The more I learn, the more I think we have been deceived.

Adolf Hitler performed an economic miracle in Germany, as King Edward VIII observed as well as many unbiased economists.

Hitler based Germany's currency on labor rather than gold or a "federal reserve bank".  It is very difficult to find detailed information on how Hitler was able to do what he did economically.  I am beginning to believe that this information is being withheld and this is why war was waged against him and still is to this day. 

I believe he created an economic system that freed the people from powerful bankers and middleman that have been robbing us blind.  Hitler ended market speculation, of which is the cause of the high prices of food and gasoline today.

I am beginning to believe that Hitler was not the monster I was taught about in school, actually, he may have been the opposite!


brotherfrancis75 said...

@My Brother-in-Christ "Pope Felix III":

Often the most controversial and dangerous topics are the most timely and important ones. This is such a topic.

The main point here is for we Roman Catholics to always remember that religion is something that should be far above and too good for politics. So our clergy should simply support the State authority as best they can and not lower their high calling down to the lowly level of "mere politics." Morally politicians and auto-mechanics have a lot in common. They just need to get the darn thing to work!

But for we Catholic laymen the situation is very different. We do indeed have a humble duty to concern themselves with "mere politics." For us the central problem of claiming that the topic of Hitler is too hot to handle is that then, very quickly, we'll discover that EVERY Roman Catholic hero is completely unacceptable. In reality public opinion is just as harsh against, for example, Constantine, Charlemagne, Frederick Barbarossa, the great Habsburg Emperors, Louis XIV, Napoleons I/II/III.IV or great Protestant champions of the Papacy like George III, Frederick the Great and Queen Victoria as it is against the late great Adolf. In reality the anti-Catholics are just as rabid against Catholic feudalism or Catholic monarchy as they are against whomever, such as Hitler. In reality a great convert to Catholicism like the actual historic George Washington is just as unacceptable in our society as the late German Chancellor.

Basically we Catholic laymen need to realise that the enemies of Christ hate our guts no matter what we do and that cowardice can only make our troubles even worse for us. Our enemies can smell cowardice from light-years away and our efforts to not be "struck by lightning" just make us more inviting targets than ever for their malicious attacks. And better thay attack us than our women, children and clergy! If someone among Catholics is born to "take the bullet," it's us laymen… That's what we're for.

If truth be told, Hitler is the greatest Catholic military hero in our very long and glorious Roman/European history. If we have the humble courage to face that incredibly unpopular fact, then the entire reality of our current historic situation will become visible to us. Then our actual position as Catholics in theology, the arts, the sciences, law, etc., etc., quickly becomes crystal-clear.

And if we don't "bite that bullet," then we will simply be chased back from one battle-line to the next until we're exterminated and we will allow our enemies to crow over our cowardly, quivering, worthless corpses. And over the corpses of our not-so-worthless women, children and clergy!!

Such are the facts of life, and such is the incomparable warrior wisdom as taught to us by our late and great Roman Catholic hero Adolf Hitler. The greatest American writer ever born, Ezra Pound, did not compare him with St. Joan of Arc for nothing.

Your Brother-in-Christ,

Franz (and in religion, Brother Francis, Franciscan Solitary)

Pope St. Felix III said...

I guess that I do not know enough about him yet to go as far as to call him a great Catholic hero, but the more I learn, the more I wonder.

Pope St. Felix III said...

Here is another myth applied to Hilter - namely that he banned firearm ownership.

The NRA is constantly claiming that Hitler made the following statement:

"This year will go down in history! For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!" - Adolf Hilter 1936

Sometimes the year is different - sometimes they claim it is a speech in which he made this statement, and some say that it was in Mein Kampf.

You see this quote on bumper stickers and posters.

Problem is it is false - Hilter never said that and never banned guns - here is a link to the history of gun politics in Germany - if you take the time to read it you will see that Hitler and the Nazi's actually relaxed gun laws and made it easier to own guys for everyone except Jews, due primarily to the fact that the majority of Jews in Germany at the time were Communists.

Pope St. Felix III said...

I feel it is necessary to state that we should not go to the extreme of making a Saint out of Hitler. He did many good things, but we do not know his interior motivations, we know very little of his personal life, and even less of his spiritual life.

M.C. said...

Interesting writeup, thank you -
once one starts working on the subject of uncovering the truth
about various aspects of
WWII it becomes all the more

As I mentioned a lot earlier here,
I studied from the angel
of the British SOE organization
which was supposedly set up
to stop Hitler by encouraging uprisings and sabotage in occupied countries.

Yet when one sifts through the
pro-British hype, it turns otu
that it was really a wrong thing to do all the way around, for everyone concerned. [Complicated subject].

The point is that the British-American
perspective of "THE ALLIES" as heroes with Nazis as horrible monsters has been inculcated so
incredibly that it takes THIS attitude of looking at the War and
the personalities involved
with dispassion and sharp-minded analysis to determine the truth.

Hitler was no angel from Heaven clearly

But the points that he was
anti-Mason, anti-abortion,
anti-homosexuals are well worth
weighing in the balance.

These, of course, are suppressed entirel.

About Brother Francis' comment,
I think he is really right about
the hatred for ANY Catholic or
pro-Catholic monarch or leader.

It's the devil working through people,

It's GREAT he mentioned
the Napoleons [even the King of Rome and the Prince Imperial, how rare it is for an American
to know anything about any of them!
May 5 yesterday was the anniversary
of Napoleon I's death, by the way.
Not very catholic, but
at least he got the Pope
involved a bit and
attended Mass occasionally.
Napoleon III brought back the Catholic Church to France
and defended the Pope to some degree with French troops.]

Finally very interesting revelation
about Edward VIII and Wallis...

jane valois said...

The whole world situation could have turned out so differently if only the young Adolf Hitler had been accepted to art school in Vienna. If memory serves me correctly his entry was either a picture of the Assumption or Annunciation. It was a very sweet picture. He was really quite good. Google his art. You might be pleasantly surprised.

Pope St. Felix III said...

He actually did several religious works of art if I remember correctly - I know I saw one of the Blessed Mother and the Infant Christ Child that was done by Hitler.

Had he been accepted to art school - the entire world would have been communist much sooner that it is now.

He slowed it down, and had he won the war - the world would likely be a better place - but who know for certain.

M.C. said...

It's interesting to speculate.

But one thing we must remember is that
by the time Hitler got to power
he was more interested in
the Norse religion, hence
all that Valkyries theme of the Nazis, and he even sent
a mission to Tibet to discover
occult secrets reported to
be hidden there.

Then, hte most important:
Catholics were persecuted
in Nazi Germany [they mostly
live in Bavaria] and
of course many from Europe
were rounded up.

Unless there is some fraud
about the story of St Maximilian
Kolbe, which I dont think,
priests definitely suffered.

The Nazis had a pagan motif, in short.

So, it's too bad that Hitler didn't stick with the interest in
Our Lady -- and
also that Stalin left the
Orthodox seminary where he was studying. Some of the dictators
may have begun life on a better track, but common to both of these
was a severe inferiority complex,
which they took out on others.

[I chose to write a paper comparing the psychology of the two and the
effect on their policies
for a European Politics class years ago...]

Pope St. Felix III said...

MC - the more I read and learn - the more I beleive all that stuff to be nonsense. Hitler attended Mass on a regular Basis and there are several photos of him entering or leaving churches. Hitler established pro-catholic policies against homosexuals, birth control, and abortion - like no politician has ever done since.

The Church supported him - including Pope Pius XII before he became Pope. It is also interesting to realize that Pope Pius XII lived until 1958 and never once did he even mention, let alone condemn the so-called "holocaust" - it would appear that he did not believe this myth.

Pope St. Felix III said...

I beleive without a doubt that the story of Maxamilian is a hoax - he was likely a communist - like many "catholic" clergy were at the time - they infiltraited the church in large numbers - read AA1028, and the Plot Against the Church - that is how Vatican II came about and how they established these anti-popes.

Just think about the story of Maxamilian - they would let him take the place of someone else who was to be executed? Really - why not just kill both? They put him in a "starvation cell" and gave him no food OR WATER for two weeks. Most people are dead within 3 days without water and it is extremely rare for anyone to live longer than 8 days - though the record supposedly is 18days - that lenght of time has been called into quesiton. And then - instead of just shooting him - they inject him with phenol? This is obviously bovine excrement - as my favorite Jew - Judge Judy would say: "If it doesn't make sense, it's usually not true".