Follow by Email

Saturday, December 31, 2005

Beyond "Munich": The Ten Movies Steven Spielberg Has Yet To Make

Imagine if we were in a parallel universe in which Hollywood gave Arabs and Muslims a fair shake. Here are ten films (all based on true stories) that are just waiting for Spielberg's magic.

By Mas'ood Cajee, December 8, 2005

Hollywood mogul Steven Spielberg's latest film "Munich" focuses on Israel's efforts to avenge the tragic killings of its athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympic Games. Although the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is ripe with great ideas for potential blockbuster films, Hollywood flicks about the conflict have tended to remain formulaic and dehumanizing.

Spielberg hopes "Munich" will be different, and claims he didn't want to make "a Charles Bronson movie — good guys vs. bad guys and Jews killing Arabs without any context." Critics say Spielberg is too pro-Israel to make a fair film about the conflict.

Imagine for a second it is Opposite Day. Imagine we're in some kind of Twilight Zone parallel universe in which Hollywood gives Arabs and Muslims a fair shake. What kind of movies about the Middle East would we then be chomping Goobers, Junior Mints, and popcorn to at the local twenty screen multiplex?

Maybe these movies might actually be made by some of the 125 Palestinian kids Spielberg is giving video cameras to document their lives. Perhaps a talented few will go on to become big-time Hollywood directors. Here are ten potential films — all inspired by actual events — that are just waiting for the magic of Spielberg & his wannabes:

1. King David Hotel: The bombing of the King David Hotel, which served as headquarters of the British administration in Palestine, killed 91 Arabs, Jews, and Brits in 1946. Two future Prime Ministers of Israel, David Ben Gurion and Menachem Begin, masterminded the attack. Disguised as Arabs, members of Begin's Irgun placed 350kg of explosives inside the building. In this action-packed thriller, David (Pierce Brosnan) — a British officer ordered to hunt down the killers — falls for Margaret (Uma Thurman), an American journalist working for Life Magazine. But is Margaret really in love or is she a secret Zionist assassin out to stop David in his tracks?

2. Nakba: A story of innocent love in a time of war and tragedy. Layla (Penelope Cruz) & Salam (Orlando Bloom) are a Romeo & Juliet against the backdrop of the 1948 Nakba, the Palestinian national catastrophe. During the Nakba, over 700,000 Palestinians fled — voluntarily & involuntarily — their homes. Can their love survive conflict?

3. USS Liberty: When Israeli boats and fighter jets attack the US Navy intelligence ship USS Liberty in the middle of the 1967 Six Day War, 34 US servicemen are killed and 173 are wounded. The official word from Washington and Tel Aviv is that the attack was a mistake. But Brad Pitt & Tom Cruise, who play surviving officers from the Liberty, swear vengeance after discovering that the attack was actually part of a plot to start World War III.

4. Sabra & Shatila: It's 1982 and the war in Lebanon rages on. British war correspondent Robert Fisk (Star Wars star Ewan MacGregor) hides in the camps of Sabra & Shatilla, while a Lebanese militia aided and abetted by Israel slaughters thousands of Palestinian refugees. Sahar (Sandra Bullock) is a Palestinian mother determined to protect her family at any cost.

5. Vanunu: A political thriller set in Israel, Australia, Thailand, England, and Italy. "Syriana" star George Clooney plays Mordechai Vanunu, the nuclear technician who exposes Israel's nuclear weapons program and pays the ultimate price. Nicole Kidman plays Cheryl Bentov, the American Mossad agent who seduces and kidnaps him.

6. Hebron: A story of tragedy and torn loyalties. In 1994, Brooklyn Jewish doctor Baruch Goldstein opened fire on Muslim worshippers in Hebron, killing 29. Palestinian American Mazen Khalili (Tom Hanks), a State Department official assigned to investigate the massacre, struggles with his job responsibilities and his roots. Leah Rabinowitz (Meg Ryan) is a Jewish American journalist who discovers a dark family secret that will change her life forever.

7. Qana: On April 18, 1996, Israeli shelling of a UN Compound that shelters Lebanese refugees kills more than 100 & injures over 300 men, women, and children. Jessica (Angelina Jolie) is a UN worker determined to let the world know what happened after witnessing the atrocity. Yossi (Robert De Niro) is a Mossad agent assigned to kill Jolie.

8. Gaza: Chris Hedges (Harrison Ford), a New York Times correspondent in Jerusalem, files stories from his hotel room. Hedges reaches a turning point when he witnesses Israeli soldiers killing young Palestinian boys for sport, then defies his editors by writing stories that humanize Palestinians. David Schwimmer & Sarah Jessica Parker make cameo appearances as the parents of Muhammad al-Durra, the 12 year old Palestinian boy killed by Israeli troops in 2000.

9. Rachel: Rachel Corrie (Gwyneth Paltrow) is the idealistic young American activist crushed to death by the Israeli army with a Caterpillar bulldozer. Sally Field, well-known for her role in "Not Without My Daughter", plays Rachel's mother.

10. Refuseniks: When a fellow soldier commits suicide after killing an unarmed pregnant Palestinian woman (played by Natalie Portman) in cold blood, two young Israeli soldiers (Matt Damon and Ben Affleck) decide that the occupation and the killing of Palestinians is immoral and unjust.Mas'ood Cajee lives in San Joaquin County, California.

unfortunately, Arabs are NOT running Hollywood, so this post is irrelevant. Power, manipulation, mass media, mass manufacture, weapons of mass destruction, these are not the forte of the Muslim Ummah. Because they require cunning, greed and corruption at a large scale. Muslims are consigned forever to second class status in this world due to the strong streak of austerity and fatalism that runs through Islamic culture. Groups that promote power and Islamic nationalism tend to eerily resemble their Western counterparts in method, once stripped of the Islamic salad dressings.

Friday, December 30, 2005


Wafer snacks show mass appeal
Quebeckers find nostalgia in 'Host Pieces'


Tuesday, December 27, 2005 Posted at 5:09 AM EST

From Tuesday's Globe and Mail

MONTREAL — Is nothing sacred in Quebec any more? The answer may lie on the grocery-store shelves of the province, next to the chips, corn puffs, and salty party pretzels.
That's where shoppers can pick up an increasingly popular snack: communion wafers and sheets of communion bread. These paper-thin morsels made from flour and water hark back to Quebec's churchgoing days and the sacred rite of receiving holy communion.
But in today's secular Quebec, the wafers and bread are packaged like peanuts and popcorn - and sold as a distinctly profane snack.
"They melt in your mouth, and they're not fattening, so it's better than junk food," said Françoise Laporte, a white-haired grandmother of 71 who buys packages of Host Pieces at her local IGA in east-end Montreal. "I'm Catholic. This reminds us of mass."

For older Quebeckers, the snacks offer up a form of nostalgia. Surprisingly, however, they're also finding favour with a younger generation that has rarely, if ever, set foot inside a church.
"My son can eat a whole bag while he's watching TV," Paul Saumure, a manager at another IGA store, said of his 22-year-old. "He's had more of them outside of church than he ever did inside one."

The snacks have been available in stores for years, but the erstwhile holy items are enjoying a second life as a health food. Gaston Bonneau, one of the two major commercial producers in Quebec, says his business started with just himself and his wife in the mid-1980s. Now it's grown to 16 employees and he plans to automate production.

He says his wafers and sheets of "host cuttings" aren't sacred - after all, they haven't been consecrated by a priest or minister in a religious service. Still, the unmistakably sacred imagery seems to strike a chord.

"It's one of those rare items that's still around from the old days . . . everyone had them at some point," he said from his office in Quebec City.

But nostalgia can get you only so far. Contemporary concerns about eating a healthier diet help, he said.

"When you eat chips there's all the fat and salt. You eat a bag of host cuttings and there's none," Mr. Bonneau said. "You might have high blood pressure or a cholesterol problem. It's not exactly crunchy granola stuff, but it is natural."

The conversion of a communion wafer into a munchie-style snack is not entirely surprising in a province that has turned its back on religious practise. Quebec has gone from being one of the most devout enclaves in North America to one of the most secular. In Montreal, churches are being refitted as condominiums and religious statuettes are sold as home decor items in antique shops.

In Quebec filmmaker Denys Arcand's award-winning Les Invasions Barbares, a Catholic priest shows off a basement full of religious items in hopes of luring the interest of an auctioneer, only to be told they're worthless.

Still, not everyone is comfortable watching a symbol of Quebec's religious heritage morph into a snack food. After all, holy communion is one of the most essential Christian sacraments that for believers symbolizes spiritual union with the body of Christ.

"People are snacking on hosts and host pieces like it's candy. They're not distinguishing between the body of Christ and something you nibble on at home," said François Trudel, a former Catholic missionary familiar with the production of communion wafers in Quebec.

"Like everything these days, we're throwing out the baby with the bathwater. We don't respect anything. Nothing is sacred."

Traditionally, communion wafers were made by religious communities. The unleavened bread left over after the wafers were cut out was sold by monasteries to their parishioners.

A handful of Quebec monasteries still produce hosts and sell the leftover unblessed bread. A visitor can gain entry past the thick stone walls of the Carmelite monastery in Montreal's Plateau Mont Royal district and, for $5, buy a plain brown bag of wafer bread from an elderly nun.

The transaction takes place in hushed tones. The image of Carmelite nun St. Thérèse of Lisieux gazes out from a large photo on the wall.

There are no cash registers, no lineups and no lottery tickets are for sale. It may be the same combination of bread and water, but it feels like a long way from the Twinkies aisle.

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

Oh - the Novus Ordo - WOW!

My father & mother were up to visit for the last few days. My father was once a member of the true Catholic Faith, but now is a crazed novus ordoite. Well we had a few discussions and one of them was rather amusing.

I had read to him the Christmas "Sunday Sermon" from one of our Bishops on their web-site.

here is the text of it:


"And she brought forth her first-born son, and wrapped him up in swaddling-clothes, and laid him in a manger: because there was no room for them in the inn."

What a wonderful mystery! How astounding that the God-man, Jesus Christ, would condescend to be born in a stable. From His very birth He takes upon Himself poverty. If He had wanted to He might have shaken the heavens by His power, and terrified all nature by His majesty. But, this was not the way of His coming; for He came not to destroy, but to save; not to display riches, but to teach us contempt of human grandeur. He therefore condescended not only to become man, but even the vilest of men.

Sadly the lessons that Christ came to teach us have fallen on deaf ears. The majority have never seen or heard of the wonderful contempt of the world that the Christ child taught. And the saddest part is that even most of those who have arrogated to themselves the title of Christian, have never even considered learning, much less putting into practice this contempt of the world.
If one is truly a Christian then he must model his life after that of Christ, he must learn the lessons that Christ came to teach and put them into practice. It is useless to say that we love God if we do not keep His word (commandments).

It is a wonderful tradition to put up the nativity scene with the little Christ child in the manger and to reflect on the happiness that Christ came to bring the world. But, this happiness has its conditions. And perhaps the first and greatest condition is the one Our Lord taught us on this wonderful day - contempt of the world.

It is good for us to celebrate Christmas with decorations and cheer for this is truly a wonderful and joyous occasion, but in the midst of our cheer we should place a sobering curb to our intoxication with the thought of the contempt that Christ had for the pleasures of this world.
When we speak of the contempt of the world, we are not condemning any licit enjoyments. All that God has made and given us is good. The problem arises when we place the good things of this world in the first place in our estimation and love. The first place belongs to God and the things of God, everything else is secondary. And when we think of the glories of God and the glories of Heaven then the things of the world seem to lose their relevance and even become contemptible in the comparison.

The beautiful things of this world are there to remind us of the beautiful things of Heaven. All the color and wonder of Christmas is supposed to fill us with a desire to see God - to go to Heaven.

If God has made the things of this world so beautiful and amazing and these things are only temporary, what must the beauty and joys of Heaven be like because they are eternal?
In our exile here on earth we are given tastes of beauty and happiness only to whet our appetites for the eternal beauty and happiness of Heaven.

The Christ child is showing us today that in the comparison _ there is no comparison. The things of this world are not even worthy to be considered in the light of Heaven. The things of this world are nothing in comparison with the eternal rewards of Heaven.

The men who live only for this world and place all their happiness and hopes in the things of this world have missed the point. They can not experience the joy of Christmas because they are not looking for it in the right places. Christ came to lead us into Heaven, not to make us satisfied with this world. And to truly desire the happiness of Heaven it is necessary that we first correctly despise this world that keeps us back and constantly distracts us from the goal.
When we learn this lesson then we will find the peace that Christ came to give us _ here on earth and most importantly in Heaven.


I then asked him if he had ever heard a "priest" in his church speak like this. He replied that he did not and my mom even agreed, but then he added that what I read was from a Bishop and I am comparing the words of a Bishop to that of a "priest".

So I said - "ok, lets see what your "bishop" has to say for a Christmas message on his web-site. This was a gamble for me - i had no idea what "bishop" Dolan from the "archdiocese" of Milwaukee wouldl have to say, but i figured - he is a novur ordo bogus bishop - i am sure it is not good.

So I went to the link and found a page that had an audio of "bishop" Dolan's Christmas message. Play it - it is amazing. He is very, very happy what "we have a God who wore diapers" NO KIDDING! - here is the link:

Well, needless to say - we found this not only amusing (because of the way it all happened with my novusordoite father), but sad.

The "point" that this apostate "bishop"was trying to supposedly make is that God became like us. This is true but for the purpose that we BECOME LIKE HIM! This apostate neglected to mention that part of it.

Also to use such a vulgar means to convey a message that God became like us. Come on. We all know that He became like us in all things, but sin, but we don't need to here about his bodily functions to get the point. This is a prime example of how file they are!

Friday, December 23, 2005

On Wisconsin - - uh - my home state - shhhh

Lovely Wisconsin: Poster Child for the Coming Police State

Prison Planet December 23 2005

Wisconsin is crazy about control. It also takes fingerprints when a police officer pulls you over for a broken taillight. (And blood specimens if they suspect you are intoxicated or on drugs.)
Additionally, Wisconsin has the proud honor of sponsoring the Super National ID legislation which will also be a Pan American Union Card as we merge with Canada and Mexico (see North American Union) and beyond.

Wisconsin Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., is responsible for writing this National ID legislation which will further erode our privacy. (Passed the House Feb 05)

Tommy Thompson, Wisconsin’s 14 year governor, who later became head of HHS, championed building a super-max prison in the state. Amnesty International has called Supermax one of the two worst facilities of its kind in the nation. Mr. Thompson is now a spokesperson for VERICHIP, the maker of implantable microchip.

I think Wisconsin is a good example of why we do not want to give government this level of control over our personal information and whereabouts or to allow data banks to be linked to our driver’s license and auto license plates.

What else is Wisconsin famous for of late?

A man was sent to prison for five years for “paper terrorism.” He sent too many papers in a complaint he had with the government.

The article about the “paper terrorist” notes, “The case produced the first prison sentence to result from a special anti-terrorism Domestic Security Unit created by then-Attorney General Jim Doyle after the terrorist attacks on Sept.11, 2001. Among its other duties, the unit investigates and prosecutes anti-government activists who try to intimidate government officials, police and citizens by filing false legal documents.” So I guess the Patriot Act comes in handy in Wisconsin with all those anti-government types.

Now Representative Sensenbrenner ( R) is showing his zeal for control as he forces his hand with the hated Patriot Act. One must question why a Jew would feel so inclined to give government this level of control over its citizens. Wasn’t the motto, “ Never again”? Why is Sensenbrenner constructing a Little Nazi Germany in Wisconsin?

References: Alex Jones Report 1-12-05 http://www, Wisconsin will have a screen to track each cell Phone in real time. They can click on a phone and listen in like a bug by law.

Police Begin Fingerprinting on Traffic Stops (re Wisconsin)

Drivers in Wisconsin Forced by Police to Give Blood Samples

Rough Reception for DNA Law Wired Nov 27 2004 In Wisconsin, for example, a lawsuit filed earlier this year by prisoners who argued that giving DNA samples violated their 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable search And seizure was tossed out by a federal appeals court.

Super National ID Card Passes House February 11, 2005

'Paper terrorist' gets five years in prison

Citation Dropped for Anti-War Sign January 11, 2005 WAUSAU, Wis. Jan 11, 2005 — The city dropped a Public obscenity citation Tuesday against a man who Erected an anti-war sign in a public square that mixed President Bush's name with a profanity.

Thursday, December 22, 2005

They are going to really try and shove this nonsense down our throats now - they cannot stand the fact that the vast majority of Americans deny their bogus theory!
Santa Claus or SATAN's CLAWS?

Have you ever given any thought to the attributes assigned to the mythical "Santa Claus" and what message we are sending to our children if we teach them that this "person" exists?

"He sees you when your sleeping, he knows when your awake, he knows if you've been bad or good..." Ominiscience- an atribute that only God has.

He delivers toys to every child everwhere on the entire planet in one night. - Ominipresent - another atribute that belongs only to God.

The ability to produce and deliver all these toys, the ability to fly, fit in chimnies, enter locked homes, move about without ever been seen - Ominipotence - another atribute that belongs to God alone.

Soooo - we teach our children that this character - Santa Claus is a god - or at least has all the powers that we know ONLY God has. Then we insist that they believe he is real - we claim he is real, and we do everything in our power to make sure that we don't let them find out that he is not real and "ruin the fun"!

The child believes all this and then at some point realizes that his parents had lied to him/her for years - and there is no "santa claus" with these powers of God.

Do you not think that the child questions, at least at the subconscious level - if God is then a hoax too?

I do not teach my children to believe in this mythical "santa claus" - I teach my children about the real St. Nicholas who lived and died in the 5th century and who was a Bishop of the Roman Catholic Church.

One day in the grocery store - a clerk innocently asked my daughter if Santa Claus was coming to her house - my daughter (six or so at the time) responed by looking at the clerk like she was crazy and said: "um, Santa Claus is dead" - the look of horror on the clerks face was worth a million bucks! it was really funny - i then explained to her what we teach our children about Santa.

I have had sooo much grief over this from my parents, in-laws, grandparents, etc... - telling me that i am ruining their childhood by not doing "trick or treat" - the "easter bunny", or santa claus.

tell me - what does a giant rabbit have to do with the Resurrection of our Lord and Savior?

What does a glutonous man in a red suit giving out toys to ungreatful beasts have to do with the birth of Christ in a stable in all humility without even a pillow to lay his head?

what does dressing up like demons, devils, murderers, monsters, and telling people to give you candy or you will play a trick on them have to do with the Eve of all Saints Day?

No - i will teach my children the truth - and the real meaning of these HOLY DAYS - not talmudic "holidays" willfully deprived of their true Christian meaning.

Today as i was getting ready for work i turned on the TV to the one channel that we get since we got rid of cable. (i figure we need to have some means of keeping in touch with the news, etc..) Anyhow - the Today Show was on - they were doing some type of "holiday" cooking segment.

In the banner below it said:

Merry Chrismakah!


This is probably what will be next - after all - it falls right in line with that satanic oxymoron - Judeo-Christian!

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Another reason to never send your children to these damn government training camps!

btw - this is from one of those "conservative" - Bush appointed Judges!

Saturday, December 17, 2005

Good for McDonalds!

Religious McDonald's Sign Draws Attention In Raleigh

Woman Asks Restaurant To Remove Sign, 'Jesus Is The Reason For The Season'

POSTED: 7:16 am EST December 14, 2005
UPDATED: 10:25 am EST December 14, 2005

RALEIGH, N.C. -- Everyone celebrates religion and holidays in their own individual ways, but currently there are questions about whether the two should be more connected. One of the latest places involved in the controversy is a McDonald's restaurant in Raleigh.

The sign at McDonald's on the corner of Falls of Neuse and Spring Forest Road reads: "Merry Christmas, Jesus is the Reason for the Season." It is a holiday message that Amanda Alpert thinks comes on a little too strongly.

"It offends me because it specifically talks about Jesus, Merry Christmas. It doesn't give credit to anyone else," Alpert said.

Alpert called the McDonald's corporate office in Atlanta and requested that the sign be changed to the politically correct Happy Holidays. The response was the owner has the right to do what she wants with the sign.

"I care because I'm Jewish, and the reason for the season is upsetting to me," Alpert said.

None of the drivers WRAL spoke to were offended by the sign.

"I've always known it to be Merry Christmas, and it is Jesus' birthday," said Tom David of Smithfield.

It's a debate that's struck a chord nationally and locally. The White House Christmas card surprised some with its "Happy Holiday Season" message. A proposed nativity scene in Raleigh recently drew a crowd at council chambers.

McDonald's managers say the sign has been good for business. They say church groups have stopped by to eat, and some people who usually don't eat food from McDonald's have stopped by because of the sign. The store's owner did not return WRAL's calls.

Friday, December 16, 2005

Hypocrisy knows no bounds!

EU Threatens Sanctions Over Holocaust Flap;_ylt=AhAVUtbDwEZJFwNwtLcmn1NSw60A;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

By NICHOLAS PAPHITIS, Associated Press Writer

European leaders threatened sanctions against Iran for its president's remarks about Israel and the Holocaust, even as the regime's interior minister said Friday the widely condemned comments were "misunderstood" by Western governments.

Leaders at a European Union summit in Brussels, Belgium, will adopt a statement Friday condemning Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent comments describing the Holocaust as a "myth" and calling for Israel to be "wiped off the map."
"These comments are wholly unacceptable and have no place in civilized political debate," the draft statement said.....


What about sanctions against Israel for its comments - such as these:
1. "There is a huge gap between us (Jews) and our enemies ­not just in ability but in morality, culture, sanctity of life, and conscience. They are our neighbors here, but it seems as if at a distance of a few hundred meters away, there are people who do not belong to our continent, to our world, but actually belong to a different galaxy." Israeli president Moshe Katsav. The Jerusalem Post, May 10, 20012.

2."The Palestinians are like crocodiles, the more you give them meat, they want more".... Ehud Barak, Prime Minister of Israel at the time - August 28, 2000. Reported in the Jerusalem Post August 30, 20003. "

3.[The Palestinians are] beasts walking on two legs." Menahim Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the Beasts". New Statesman, 25 June 1982.4.

4. "The Palestinians" would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed against the boulders and walls." " Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 19885.

5. "When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle." Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April 1983.6.

6. "How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to." Golda Meir, March 8, 1969.7.

7. "There was no such thing as Palestinians, they never existed." Golda Maier Israeli Prime Minister June 15, 19698.

8. "The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us in June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical existence is only bluff, which was born and developed after the war." Israeli General Matityahu Peled, Ha'aretz, 19 March 1972.9.

9. David Ben Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): "If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti - Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?" Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121.9a.

9a. Ben Gurion also warned in 1948 : "We must do everything to insure they ( the Palestinians) never do return." Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes. "The old will die and the young will forget."

10. "We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves." Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.

11. "Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it." - Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. (Certainly the FBI's cover-up of the Israeli spy ring/phone tap scandal suggests that Mr. Sharon may not have been joking.)

12. "We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel... Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours." Rafael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces - Gad Becker, Yediot Ahronot 13 April 1983, New York Times 14 April 1983.

13. "We must do everything to ensure they [the Palestinian refugees] never do return" David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar's Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157.

15. "We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai." David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.

16. "We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population." Israel Koenig, "The Koenig Memorandum"

17. "Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population." Moshe Dayan, address to the Technion, Haifa, reported in Haaretz, April 4, 1969.

18. "We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population?' Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!'" Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979.

19. Rabin's description of the conquest of Lydda, after the completion of Plan Dalet. "We shall reduce the Arab population to a community of woodcutters and waiters" Uri Lubrani, PM Ben-Gurion's special adviser on Arab Affairs, 1960. From "The Arabs in Israel" by Sabri Jiryas.

20. "There are some who believe that the non-Jewish population, even in a high percentage, within our borders will be more effectively under our surveillance; and there are some who believe the contrary, i.e., that it is easier to carry out surveillance over the activities of a neighbor than over those of a tenant. [I] tend to support the latter view and have an additional argument:...the need to sustain the character of the state which will henceforth be Jewish...with a non-Jewish minority limited to 15 percent. I had already reached this fundamental position as early as 1940 [and] it is entered in my diary." Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department. From Israel: an Apartheid State by Uri Davis, p.5.

21. "Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to enlarge the settlements because everything we take now will stay ours... Everything we don't grab will go to them." Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.

22. "It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism,colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands." Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.

23. "Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment... Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly." Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine,Complete Diaries, June 12, 1895 entry.

24. "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." -- Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [Source: N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1]

Sunday, December 11, 2005

Know your enemy!

The Jewish grinch who stole Christmas

Posted: December 7, 20051:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005

I never thought I'd live to see the day that Christmas would become a dirty word. You think it hasn't? Then why is it that people are being prevented from saying it in polite society for fear it will offend?

Schools are being forced to replace "Christmas vacation" with "winter break" in their printed schedules. At Macy's, the word is verboten even though they've made untold millions of dollars from their sympathetic portrayal in the Christmas classic, "Miracle on 34th Street." Carols, even instrumental versions, are banned in certain places. A major postal delivery service has not only made their drivers doff their Santa caps, but ordered them not to decorate their trucks with Christmas wreaths.

How is it, one well might ask, that in a Christian nation this is happening? And in case you find that designation objectionable, would you deny that India is a Hindu country, that Pakistan is Muslim, that Poland is Catholic? That doesn't mean those nations are theocracies. But when the overwhelming majority of a country's population is of one religion, and roughly 90 percent of Americans happen to be one sort of Christian or another, only a damn fool would deny the obvious.

Although it seems a long time ago, it really wasn't, that people who came here from other places made every attempt to fit in. Assimilation wasn't a threat to anyone – it was what the Statue of Liberty represented. E pluribus unum, one out of many, was our motto. The world's melting pot was our nickname. It didn't mean that any group of people had to check their customs, culture or cuisine, at the door. It did mean that they, and especially their children, learned English, and that they learned to live and let live.

That has changed, you may have noticed. And I blame my fellow Jews. When it comes to pushing the multicultural, anti-Christian agenda, you find Jewish judges, Jewish journalists, and the American Civil Liberties Union, at the forefront.

Being Jewish, I should report, Christmas was never celebrated by my family. But what was there not to like about the holiday? To begin with, it provided a welcome two-week break from school. The decorated trees were nice, the lights were beautiful, "It's a Wonderful Life" was a great movie, and some of the best Christmas songs were even written by Jews.
But the dirty little secret in America is that anti-Semitism is no longer a problem in society – it's been replaced by a rampant anti-Christianity. For example, the hatred spewed toward George W. Bush has far less to do with his policies than it does with his religion. The Jews voice no concern when a Bill Clinton or a John Kerry makes a big production out of showing up at black Baptist churches or posing with Rev. Jesse Jackson because they understand that's just politics. They only object to politicians attending church for religious reasons.
My fellow Jews, who often have the survival of Israel heading the list of their concerns when it comes to electing a president, only gave 26 percent of their vote to Bush, even though he is clearly the most pro-Israel president we've ever had in the Oval Office.

It is the ACLU, which is overwhelmingly Jewish in terms of membership and funding, that is leading the attack against Christianity in America. It is they who have conned far too many people into believing that the phrase "separation of church and state" actually exists somewhere in the Constitution.

You may have noticed, though, that the ACLU is highly selective when it comes to religious intolerance. The same group of self-righteous shysters who, at the drop of a "Merry Christmas" will slap you with an injunction, will fight for the right of an American Indian to ingest peyote and a devout Islamic woman to be veiled on her driver's license.

I happen to despise bullies and bigots. I hate them when they represent the majority, but no less when, like Jews in America, they represent an infinitesimal minority. I am getting the idea that too many Jews won't be happy until they pull off their own version of the Spanish Inquisition, forcing Christians to either deny their faith and convert to agnosticism or suffer the consequences.

I should point out that many of these people abhor Judaism every bit as much as they do Christianity. They're the ones who behave as if atheism were a calling. They're the nutcakes who go berserk if anyone even says, "In God we trust" or mentions that the Declaration of Independence refers to a Creator with a capital "C." By this time, I'm only surprised that they haven't begun a campaign to do away with Sunday as a day of rest. After all, it's only for religious reasons – Christian reasons – that Sunday, and not Tuesday or Wednesday, is so designated.

This is a Christian nation, my friends. And all of us are fortunate it is one, and that so many Americans have seen fit to live up to the highest precepts of their religion. Speaking as a member of a minority group – and one of the smaller ones at that – I say it behooves those of us who don't accept Jesus Christ as our savior to show some gratitude to those who do, and to start respecting the values and traditions of the overwhelming majority of our fellow citizens, just as we keep insisting that they respect ours.
Merry Christmas.

Burt Prelutsky has been a humor columnist for the L.A. Times, a movie critic for Los Angeles magazine and a freelance writer for TV Guide, Modern Maturity, the N.Y. Times and Sports Illustrated. He has also written TV scripts for shows such as "MASH," "Mary Tyler Moore" and "Diagnosis Murder." His most recent book "Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco," is available from WND's online store, ShopNetDaily, or if you'd rather order by phone, call WND's toll-free customer service line at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).

Friday, December 09, 2005

Since we have been on the subject....

Holocaust Fundamentalism - You WILL Believe

By Mark Green12-3-5

You've seen the films. You've read the books. You've taken the courses. You've heard the news. Soon, your children will be visiting the museums. Everybody knows it's true.

The era of mandatory belief in The Holocaust has arrived. Articles central to The Faith include unwavering commitment to Jewish casualty numbers with a full and complete understanding of the manner in which innocent Jews were gassed, murdered and executed in Nazi Germany. Recalcitrant non-believers are now being rounded up. The typical rhetoric goes: "these bigots deny the facts and lessons garnered from humankind's experience during WWII. Their unique kind of poison will not be tolerated. This is a democracy. You are under arrest."

Only this is not a movie. This is real.

In Europe and North America, Holocaust skeptics are being apprehended, arrested and are now facing lengthy prison terms. Few people have noticed. Nobody's supposed to care. Big media certainly doesn't. Nor the politicians. These Holocaust-denying apostates include British author and historian David Irving, Holocaust revisionist Ernst Zundel, German chemist Gemar Rudolf, and others. Their crimes involve disbelief: they dispute the official version of events involving Jews during WWII.

In an era where nearly anything goes, why does the truth need special laws to protect it? Curious, that.

Beginning Jan. 27, 2006, and continuing every year thereafter, the United Nations will inaugurate its first annual Holocaust Remembrance Day. This Israeli-sponsored resolution not only institutionalizes and broadens global sensitivity to The Holocaust, but it will surely aid in prosecuting individuals who reject official Holocaust dogma. The State Church has arrived. It's creed: Holocaust fundamentalism.

Question: to what extent do these escalating measures have more than nothing to do with America's "special relationship" with the Jewish State, our war in Iraq, and our saber-rattling towards Syria and Iran? Just curious.

Resistance to the global New Doctrine however is growing. Among the arguments:

Laws regulating 'historical interpretation' are themselves a crime. Take your Thought Control laws and shove it.

Primary question: How many Jews died (and how many were deliberately killed) during WWII? How do we know?

In how many Western Democracies is doubting the "correct number " of Jewish victims during WWII now against the law? (seven)

It's known that after the second world war, the Red Cross put the number of Jewish deaths at considerably less than one million. That's still a lot of dead people. Yes, it is theoretically possible that 6,000,000 Jews were killed during the war, but--forgive me--I sense a bold exaggeration.

But aside from that, since when is skepticism a crime? Where are the bodies, for instance? May I have a list of names, please?

Even the Yard Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel, after 60 years, can only muster three million names, and many of those names are of Jews who merely died (or disappeared) during WWII, causes unknown. Many names appear more than once. In a similar vein, while the number of Jews murdered at Auschwitz was officially reduced by millions in recent years, the irreducible number of "six million Jews" remains. Isn't it possible that there's some politically-motivated chicanery here?

It is, after all, indisputable that some earlier "facts" regarding the Holocaust have been streamlined and smoothed out for popular consumption. The lamp shade and human soap stories, for instance, have been quietly retired. The secret dealings between Nazis and Zionists during WWII have been suppressed. Another ignored fact concerns the lethal Typhus epidemics in the death camps. Why have they been airbrushed from popular memory?

One problem is that all the "experts" tend to be Jewish and show bias on the subject. How many Germans died in WWII? Five million? Actually I'm not sure, since their suffering isn't supposed to matter and therefore their casualties aren't noted. What was the total number of dead in WWII?--50 million? How many have died in wars during the 20th Century?--275 million? (that's Zbig. Brezinski's estimate). Considering this, even if six million Jews were deliberately killed during WWII, shouldn't we demand that the Zionized world stop caring so singularly about Jewish suffering? The Jewish obsession with everything Jewish is shamefully narcissistic and burdensome. Their defiant ethnocentrism is an ongoing insult to the rest of the human race.

As for the "un-revisable" six million figure, Jews have superstitious reasons pertaining to the number "six" for claiming that six million died. In fact, similar charges about six million Jews were made, incredibly, in 1919, concerning the fantastic number of Jews facing death during WWI. These nutty allegations were even published in the NY Times. The claimants were Jewish.

But why?

Another reason Jews want to hype the number of victims is that they wanted to have the greatest causality count so they could claim supreme victimhood and reap the political rewards. Holocaust lore is essential to the precarious legitimacy of the Jewish State. Just ask the Palestinians.

But the Holocaust story as now told is a libel on the German people, since it pretends to show that German anti-Semitism sprang from nowhere. But the real story is more complicated.

Rightly or wrongly, the Nazis blamed the Jews for America's entry into WWI as well as the unjust and punitive Treaty of Versailles which followed. It's also undeniable that international Jewry "declared war" (and launched an international boycott) on Hitler's Germany in 1933. Even the outrage know as "Kristallnacht" was provoked in part by a Jewish assassin (Herschel Grynszpan) who, on November 7, 1938, walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot and killed Ernest vom Rath, a German diplomat.

We know, for instance, that soon after the turn of the century, Jews comprised many if not most of the leading political radicals in Europe. They were instrumental in orchestrating and managing the Communist revolution which killed millions of non-Jews well before Hitler's rise. Why aren't the Nazi-hunters interested in finding any of these mass-murderers? Is it justice they're after, or revenge and political advantage? The "innocent little Jewish shopkeeper" archetype as peddled on TV is a self-exculpating myth.

However, that Jews were persecuted and murdered during Hitler's reign is irrefutable. I've never seen or read a Holocaust "denier" who claims otherwise. Not one. The extraordinary claim that "6,000,000 Jews were systematically murdered" is what they contest. This deliberate mischaracterization of Holocaust revisionism has been spread widely and purposefully by keepers of the Holocaust faith. And the disinformation continues to flow.

David Irving, the imprisoned author of dozens of works on WWII, is now alleged to have recently "recanted" some of his "Holocaust denial claims". But his change-of-heart cannot believed so long as he is being held captive on account of his scholarship.

One reader suggested that we call the search for truth in this matter "Holocaust factualism". Good start. Both teams in this historical divide are clearly inundated with advocates posing as scholars. The entire investigation therefore has been rigged from the start. At the same time, it can't be denied that those championing the Official Version are basically holding all the political cards and resources.

But even if we accept their self-serving stories and invisible body counts, it's still outrageous that the Jews and their lackeys deliberately ignore all the non-Jewish fatalities in Hitler's "death camps". Holocaust survivor, Bruno Bettelheim, writing in his book, "Surviving", notes that according to the Communists in East Germany in 1945, as many as 11 million died in Hitler's gulags, of which 5.5 to six million were Jewish. This means that, according to Bettelheim, it's possible that as many as half of Hitler's concentration camp victims were gentiles! Where are the monuments to these innocent people? Why is their story being suppressed? Or should we now direct this Kosher Inquisition towards Bruno Bettelheim?

Whatever your view on the casualty count (or the disputed gas chamber stories), the focus must return to the core issue: intellectual freedom.

Historical truth doesn't need to be protected by any special law or speech code. Irving, Zundel, Rudolf and others, need and deserve our unwavering support if we intend to remain even nominally free.

Thursday, December 08, 2005

What now? Throw Mel Gibson and his dad in Jail?,5744,17498008%255E2702,00.html

Disown your dad's denial of the Holocaust, Gibson toldDavid Nason, New York

correspondentDecember 08, 2005

A WORLD authority on Hitler's Final Solution has called on Australian actor-director Mel Gibson to publicly repudiate the Holocaust denial of his father Hutton Gibson and to clarify his own position on the extermination of the Jews.Rafael Medoff of the US-based David S. Wyman Institute of Holocaust Studies issued the ultimatum after the Walt Disney-owned ABC television said a Gibson company would produce a four-part Holocaust mini-series for the US network next year.

Tentatively titled Flory, the telemovie will tell the true story of Flory Van Beek, a Dutch Jew who survived the Holocaust through the bravery of three Christian families who sheltered her from the Nazis in Holland.

Gibson's Con Artist Productions reportedly clinched the deal with a breathtaking pitch for a climactic "Braveheart-style" battle scene where thousands of Jewish and Nazi combatants rush at each other across an open field.

But Dr Medoff was unimpressed, saying Disney should step in and sack Gibson if he refuses to fully acknowledge the extent of the Nazi genocide.
"By choosing to inject himself into public discussions of the Holocaust by his association with this movie, Mel Gibson has a moral obligation to come clean and clearly repudiate his father's statements denying the Holocaust," Dr Medoff said.
"If he declines to publicly repudiate Holocaust denial and continues to maintain that the Holocaust was just one of numerous similar atrocities during World War II, then Disney and the ABC should reconsider their arrangements with him."

Adding to the controversy is the memory of Gibson's The Passion of the Christ, one of last year's top-grossing films but one condemned as anti-Semitic by many Jewish organisations.
Both the Gibsons were named in the Wyman Institute's 2004 global survey of Holocaust denial.
Hutton Gibson told New York radio station WSNR the Holocaust was mostly fiction because the Nazi's never had enough petrol to burn six million Jews.
"They did not have the gas to do it," he said. "That's why they lost the war." He went on to deny the mass extermination of Poland's Jews, saying they had "simply got up and left".
"They were all over the Bronx and Brooklyn, and Sydney, Australia, and Los Angeles," he said.
When asked last year by ABC reporter Diane Sawyer about his father's statements, Mel Gibson replied: "He's my father. Gotta leave it alone, Diane. Gotta leave it alone."

Asked about his father's religious beliefs and view of the Holocaust in the March 2004 edition of Reader's Digest, Gibson said: "My dad taught me my faith, and I believe what he taught me. The man never lied to me in his life."

Pressed further to go on the record and say the Holocaust happened, Gibson said: "Yes, of course. Atrocities happened. War is horrible. The Second World War killed tens of millions of people. Some of them were Jews in concentration camps. Many people lost their lives. In the Ukraine, several million starved to death between 1932 and 1933."
Dr Medoff said Gibson was trying to "minimise and blur the Holocaust" by making it just one of many atrocities of the war.

"This is ridiculous and clearly contrary to the historical record," he said.

"It indicates that he himself has some sort of distorted, troubling view of the Holocaust."

Typical Judaism!

Monday, December 05, 2005

Kurd Burger and Fries?

"I swear by God I walked by a room and on my left I saw a grinder with blood coming out of it and human hair underneath,";_ylt=Ao2bkgixYNFpML.ZAcPt7TxX6GMA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

ah - yea - sure you did.

Was this at a McMuslim run where Saddam was the manager?

Next we will hear about human soap, lamp shades, and showers that really let out gas to kill the prisoners - oh - wait - wrong fable!

Saturday, December 03, 2005

Food for Thought on the Gas Chambers.

Since the previous post that started this discussion between myself and Derek is getting soo long i thought i would start another.

Here is some information regarding the "gas chambers" of the Holocaust legend that is very telling.

Three of the best known works on the Second World War are General Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill's The Second World War (London: Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Mémoires de guerre of General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959). In these three works not ONE SINGLE MENTION of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.
Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find NO MENTION either of Nazi "gas chambers," a "genocide" of the Jews, or of "six million" Jewish victims of the war.

Why the silence?

Why in the works of some of the most prominent players in WWII - Eisenhower, Churchill, de Gaulle - do we not find a SINGLE MENTION of Nazi Gas Chambers or the Mass execution of Jews?

One would think that the mass murder of 6 million innocent men, women and children, by such extraordinary means as showers that were really gas chambers - would have at least warranted some mention.

Surely - these men had heard of these accusations - surely they knew of the Nuremberg trails.

What is the explanation for there not being a single mention of what we are told was such a profound part of the War?

It is also very interesting to note that Pope Pius XII who was the Vicar of Christ during the whole of WWII (depending on when you believe it actually started) till 1958 - did not make a SINGLE MENTION of a mass execution of Jews.

What can explain this? After all Pope Pius XII condemned many things that the Germans and others did during WWII, including the terror bombings of innocent civilians during WWII by the Allies and the Axis - but no mention of the wholesale slaughter - the supposed willful murder of SIX MILLION innocent men, women, and children -and the VICAR OF CHRIST never even MENTIONS IT! Remember - he lived almost 10 years AFTER the conclusion of Nuremberg!

What can explain this?