This Blog is dedicated to the following quote:
Pope St. Felix III (5th Century): "Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it, and, indeed, to neglect to confound evil men - when we can do it - is no less a sin than to encourage them."
Follow by Email
Thursday, July 12, 2018
The Trump Deception
If you think Trump is your political savior - you need to wake the hell up - you are under a demonic spell.
The weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth has begun on the left, but the truth is that Donald Trump could have nominated someone far more conservative on Monday night.
Over the next several months there will be endless protests in Washington D.C. as liberals moan and groan about “the end of our freedoms”, and Brett Kavanaugh will be relentlessly portrayed as a conservative devil by the mainstream media. And even though NBC News is insisting that Kavanaugh “would make the high court solidly conservative” if he is confirmed, the reality of the matter is that there are some pretty good reasons why conservatives should be deeply concerned about this pick. Just because a Republican president nominates someone to the Supreme Court does not mean that individual will make a good judge. For example, Ronald Reagan nominated Anthony Kennedy in 1987, and he turned out to be a complete and utter disaster. If Reagan had nominated someone different, the entire modern history of the U.S. Supreme Court could have been completely different. With the Court still so divided, the stakes are incredibly high, and we must not get another Kennedy. So it is troubling that Brett Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy and has always had nothing but good things to say about him. Anyone that would look to Justice Kennedy as any sort of a role model is definitely not fit for a seat on the highest court in the land.
Beyond his connections to Kennedy, what is troubling conservatives more than anything are some of his opinions while serving on the appellate court level.
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia by President George W. Bush, accepted the assumption in a dissenting opinion he filed last October in the case of Garza v. Hargan that a teenage illegal alien caught at the border and put in detention has a right to an abortion in the United States.
In that opinion he also added that “all parties to this case recognize Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey as precedents we must follow.”
Throughout his entire career, Kavanaugh has been extremely engaged in Republican politics, but he has never expressed public opposition to Roe v. Wade a single time.
So despite the outrageous claims of the left that Roe v. Wade “is about to be overturned”, the truth is that we actually have no idea how Brett Kavanaugh would rule on Roe v. Wade, and that is absolutely frightening.
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia by President George W. Bush, declined to rule against Obamacare’s individual mandate when it came before his court in 2011 and argued that the case could not be decided by a federal court until at least 2015 because of the Anti-Injunction Act.
All nine members of the Supreme Court—including Justices Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas—would later join in opinions (in the Obamacare case that the Supreme Court decided in 2012) that rejected the argument Kavanaugh embraced that the Anti-Injunction Act prevented a pre-2015 ruling on the Obamacare mandate.
All of the “experts” on television keep telling us how “conservative” Kavanaugh is, but looking at his record that is hard to see.
Following a brief period in private law practice, he became Bush’s White House counsel and then staff secretary before he was nominated to be a federal judge. He met his wife while working at the White House, where she was the president’s personal secretary.
Donald Trump likes to think that he is making his mark on the Supreme Court, but the reality of the matter is that we probably would have gotten the exact same nomination if George W. Bush was still in the White House today.
I hope that he proves me wrong, but I believe that the nomination of Kavanaugh is a huge mistake. I believe that he is a moderate, especially on social issues, and I do not trust him.
But most conservatives are going to assume that Kavanaugh must be wonderful since he is “Trump’s choice”, and they are going to rally around him.
It didn’t take long for protests to start. Around 15 minutes after the announcement, chants had shifted to “Hey Hey, Ho Ho, Kavanaugh has got to go.” Some protesters had makeshift signs that had been updated with the nominee only minutes after his announcement.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., told the crowd of protesters that they should be ready to challenge the nomination.
“Are you ready for a fight? Are you ready to defend Roe vs. Wade?” Sanders said. “This is a tough fight but it is a fight that we can win . . . We have the American people on our side, now we have to go state by state by state to make sure senators do what their constituents want.”
If the Democrats were smart, they would conduct some token protests to make it look good and then confirm Kavanaugh as quickly as possible.
With Trump in the White House, they simply are not going to get an activist liberal judge on to the Court. Another judge in the mold of Anthony Kennedy is about the best that they could possibly hope for, and that is very likely what they are going to get with Kavanaugh.
In the end, it is true conservatives that should be fighting this nomination, but we all know that is simply not going to happen.
Powerful and undeniable information about what is right around the corner for all of us.
While most of the unthinking masses are caught up in the "left/right paradigm", behind the scenes the stage is being set for the anti-christ.
This plan goes back to the foot of the Cross and today, the means to implement it are here.
With the fall of Christian Europe being finalized with WWII, the plans have been in high gear.
Even the handful of true Catholics left, for the most part, allow themselves to be deceived by these luciferian politicians that sound "conservative".
Know this - THERE ARE NO GOOD POLITICIANS, at least of any power or influence.
It is all a matter of smoke and mirrors - they have to make it APPEAR that there are "outsiders" on "our side" as they implement their plans, but a careful analysis of these so called "good politicians" quickly shoes that, while they talk one way, their actions are quite contrary.
Anyhow - take the time to watch this video so that you are prepared for what is coming:
I am certain that to many people, all of this seems crazy, but it MUST be realized that there are people in this world who truly believe that God is their oppressor and satan is their liberator.
These luciferians hold positions of power in every aspect of this world. Hollywood is a coven of witches and they do not even try to hide it anymore.
Politicians are virtually all freemasons of one brand or another and literally all are under the control of Jewish Kabbalahists.
Remember our Lord warned us that this day would come when He said: "When I return, think you I will find ANY Faith on earth".
Scripture is filled with references to satan being the ruler of this world.
It is all happening just as our Lord warned us it would, yet people who should know and be able to see it, still allow themselves to be deceived by the worshipers of the prince of this world.
Pray, Pray, and Pray more
AND DO NOT STICK YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND
Jesus said: "Behold I send you as sheep in the midst of wolves. Be ye therefore wise as serpents and simple as doves"
He instructed us numerous times to know the signs of the times.
The last days will result in many of the elect (those who appear to be true Catholics) being deceived - do not be among them.
Love God with your whole being and beg Him to make you aware of what is coming and to preserve you through it!
President Donald Trump's White House will host a ceremonial iftar dinner this week to mark the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. The iftar is a daily breakfast meal for Muslims who fast from sunrise to sunset during the month.
Fasting during Ramadan is one of the five pillars of the Muslim faith. Those who participate take part in two ritual meals: The iftar after sunset, to break the daily fast, and suhoor, before sunrise, to prepare for the day's fast.
The iftar meal is often eaten communally, with family and friends at home, or at a local mosque. Many Muslims also include dates in that meal, as tradition dictates that is how the Prophet Muhammad broke his fast.
President Donald Trump will host an iftar dinner on Wednesday to celebrate the month of Ramadan, a White House official told Politico. Trump did not host an iftar dinner in 2017, breaking the traditional dinners Barack Obama and George W. Bush used to hold. Last month, the White House released a statement to commemorate Ramadan and the Muslims in the U.S. who were participating in the holy month.
I received the following letter from Fr. Bernard and was asked to post it on the blog. I did not want to get into this discussion anymore, but am now compelled to do so. If you click on the pages of the letter it should get larger for you to read.
I feel that I must comment on some of this. The first point that Father makes (point 1) is clear. Father then gives several quotes from the Church on how laborers and employers should work together justly and as Christ would dictate.
If you would like further commentary on the position of the Catholic Church regarding labor unions and the communist influence within many of them you should listen to Fr. Coughlin, of whom the Papal Nuncio to the United States said: "As the Holy Father teaches, Fr. Coughlin preaches."This statement about Fr. Coughlin was made after many clergy in the United States who disagreed with him appealed to the Pope to silence him.
Here is an excellent talk that Fr. Couglin gave back in 1939
Fr. Coughlin explains very clearly that it is the right (and even duty) of workers to form and have Unions and at the same time how we must fight the Communists who seek control of Unions. The Communists need to control Unions so that they can destroy them and the middle class in one sweeping motion.
I have stated ad nauseam that I do not support the liberal and evil causes that some Unions support, such as abortion and homosexual marriage, etc.
Because some Unions are led by evil men and support evil things, to me is not an excuse to ban Unions all together - which is exactly what Walker, the governor of Wisconsin, is trying to do, and to claim otherwise, as some have, is disingenuous at best.
By eliminating collective bargaining, you are eliminating the entire purpose and function of a Union or for that matter, even a laborer's Guild. The entire purpose of Unions and laborer Guilds is to bargain on behalf of the employees, hence the term "collective" (meaning all of the employees). definition of collective
I must point out that I have not found the words "collective bargaining" in the Communist Manifesto as Fr. Bernard claims in his letter. I have read an online version of this document and have used a search engine to search the document for these words (Click Here and and here) and nowhere do I find the words "collective bargaining" in the Communist Manifesto.
I called Fr. Bernard to ask him just where in this document I can find these words so that I could read them in their context.
Father Bernard then informed me that he actually had not read these words in the Communist Manifesto himself, but was rather informed by a Parishioner that they were there and that he took this man at his word (which appears to be an error).
But even if the words: "collective bargaining" did appear in the Communist Manifesto - does that mean that it is a communist idea or ideal? The Communist Manifesto calls for an end to child factory labor - does that mean ending child labor is a bad thing or communistic in nature?
I believe that Communists hate Unions because they raise the middle class out of poverty and give them the ability to own property - something Communists hate. If communism is ever to reach its full evil potential in the United States they have to reduce the middle class to poverty. This is why the Communists, as Fr. Coughlin stated so well, have been working to destroy the Unions by taking leadership roles in them!
Remember it was Lenin who said: "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it"
I do not believe that collective bargaining is a euphemistic term - it has a specific legal definition and is the term or phrase used when employees in a Union or Guild appoint people to represent all of the members in bargaining for wages, benefits, working conditions, etc. for their next contract term. Legal Definition of Collective Bargaining
Collective bargaining is what Unions do and to virtually eliminate the ability of workers to collectively bargain with their employers effectively eliminates the entire purpose of Unions AND Guilds.
To claim that one supports workers rights to organize and have a Union, but not to have the ability to collectively bargian would be like saying: I am not against McDonalds and support McDonalds having a right to be a restaurant, but I also support making fast food illegal.
Or in a religious sense, it is like some of these heretic traditionalists who want Bishops with no Jurisdiction. A Union without the ability to collectively bargain is like a Bishop without Jurisdiction - it is without purpose.
I feel and believe with all my heart that a line was crossed in Wisconsin by the attempt to take away the ability of public workers to collectively bargain.
Father mentioned to me on the phone that he would like to see the Catholic Guilds come back, well, if they did, they could not function under this legislation, for they too would not have the right or ability to collectively bargain on behalf of the Guild members!
I agree 100000% that some Unions are controlled by evil people and support very evil things, like abortion, homosexual marriage, etc. - but so does our government. Father seems to imply that it would be sinful to be a member of a union that has supported evil, but does this logic apply to our government?
The United States Government uses public funds to fund abortion via Planned Parenthood, the United States Government supports homosexual marriage, and countless evils - including giving billions and billions of dollars of our taxes to the evil Talmudic Christ-hating State of Israel.
Is it anymore sinful to be a citizen of this nation and pay taxes to this nation than it is to be a member of a union and pay union dues?
Even St. Paul appealed to Rome as a citizen when arrested and Rome was guilty of evil as great or even greater than this nation or even the worst of Unions! source
It seems to me that if one does not support the evils that the organization does and tries to stop it, it would not necessarily be sinful to belong if it is necessary to be employed in that field. Sort of like buying Kosher food or shopping at a store that gives money to United Way which in turn, gives money to Planned Parenthood, etc.
If we were to not give business or money to any business that directly or indirectly supports things contrary to the Catholic Faith - we would not be able to live in this world at all. I guess we need to expose evil and fight it as best we reasonably can and do good whenever and wherever possible.
I believe what Wisconsin should have done is offer legislation that would stop Unions from using member dues to support things that have nothing to do with the purpose of the Union. They could also pass laws limiting their political influence.
But the elimination of their primary purpose, namely to collectively bargain on behalf of their members, goes too far and denies workers the right to be represented, a right which Father says we have in his first point in his letter. This law makes no exeptions - even if the Union is good and morally sound.
The idea of guilt by association can be extended to the Wisconsin governor who brought about this whole mess to begin with.
It was not the leaders of any public sector Unions that had dinner and met with the Communist leaders of China - it was none other than Scott Walker: Walker meets with President of China
The Koch brother(s), who are MAJOR campaign donors and supporters of Scott Walker are crypto Jews who support stem-cell research, homosexuality, and evolution - to the point of having a hall in the Smithsonian called the: David Koch Hall of Human Origins. The promotion of this hall includes an image which depicts the famous painting of God and man touching fingers with God as a Monkey. Sources: click here and click here and click here
What does that say about the motives of the man who accepts money and support from such people?
His political payback is being exposed, such as giving an $81,500.00 a year State Job to a young man who has no college degree and has two drunk driving convictions on his record - what were his qualifications for this job? His father donated large sums of money to Walker! Source: click here
Regarding the "priest" that Father quotes in his letter - "Fr." Robert Sirico - I must point out that Fr. Bernard did not know the history of this heretic novus ordo "priest".
I will inform the readers of this man's history so that they do not make the same error in quoting him.
Robert Sirico was born into a Catholic family, but stopped practicing his faith by age 13. By age 21, he had become an ordained Pentecostal minister, and established the Robert Sirico Foundation to aid in his healing ministry. In 1972, Sirico let it be known that he had been aware of his homosexuality most of his life, and he began performing same-sex wedding ceremonies in Seattle, Washington. By 1975, he was pastor of the Metropolitan Community Church in Santa Monica, California, where he continued to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies. By the early 1980s, Sirico returned to the Catholic Church. Source: click here
This "priest" has appeared on EWTN's "Theology on Tab" in which he sits around drinking beer with college kids talking about Theology. Source: click here and click here
He is the leader of a Zionist Neocon organization called: the Action Institute, which many, many times quotes Rabbis and other Talmudic Jews to support his economic beliefs and world views - here are a few examples:
This "priest" also does not speak the truth when he says/implies that all public sector unions support abortion and gay marriage. There are many different Unions that represent public sector employees in Wisconsin that are effected by this legislation and they do not all support abortion and gay marriage. The much talked about Teacher's Union does, that is why this Union is the only one discussed by the neo-cons.
In conclusion, I stand by my belief that it is wrong to eliminate collective bargaining, because the elimination of this specific legal phrase amounts to the elimination of the right to have a Union or laborers Guild, since collective bargaining is the entire and sole purpose of a Union or laborers Guild.
In order to fulfill Father Bernard's first point:
"It is a just right for the working class to have an organization represent them on issues concerning their welfare, such as wages, working hours, etc., as long as they are just and not morally opposed to the teachings of the Catholic Church."
Workers must be allowed the right to collectively bargain - without this right there is no possibly way that an organization can represent them on issues concerning their welfare.
virtus in media stat
The above comments, which I am compelled by conscience to make, are my personal opinions and are not meant to be taken as any sort of statement on Catholic teaching.
There seems to be a common theme among the Friars out of Rochester, NY. They seem to be desperately searching for an earthly messiah.
Fr. Joseph Noonan is practically worshiping Donald Trump and completely blind to anything negative about the man (sure he plays a little lip service saying that he does not agree with everything he does, but immediately glosses over that and rants on and on about how great he is).
Fr. Bernard is much the same. When the communist Scott Walker was elected governor of Wisconsin, Fr. Bernard put politics and his love of this creep ahead of the teachings of the Catholic Church!
He made a complete ass out of himself by ordering me to publish a letter that he wrote and then dared to order me to not comment on it. Little did he know, I was in contact with the Bishops who gave me permission to comment on his stupid letter and said that he could not order me to not address his "points".
Below is a link to that letter and my comments. (I will also republish it in the next post
One would think they would learn from their mistakes, but no, they just keep falling for the same satanic lies and deceptions.
There is only one Savior, and He is not a politician!
Fr. Joseph Noonan on his recent radio show, which thankfully has almost no listeners, (evidenced by the fact that a recent show featuring Bp Giles Butler in which his mic was out, not a single person called in to say that the Bishop could not be heard) babbled on and on about how pleased he is with Donald Trump. I wonder why he is so pleased with this man?
Is it because Trump continues to fund abortion with his taxes?
Trump signs $1.3 trillion budget bill that still funds Planned Parenthood
Perhaps it is because Trump upholds Catholic values in his life - oh wait, he has been "married" how many times? Maybe it is because his current "wife" is of high moral character, oops - wait, not only is she an adulterous, but she posed nude and in pornographic lesbian themed photos!
BTW, didn't John the Baptist lose his head over refusing to accept a leader in an invalid marriage?
How can a supposed "man of God" be so happy about this man being his "leader"?
THINK PEOPLE THINK!
Is Noonan just intellectually deficient? This is definitely part of the problem.
Is Noonan deceived? Possibly, but he is deceived by himself and his desire for an earthly leader - much like the Jews who rejected Christ wanted an earthly messiah!
Is Noonan deceiving? Possibly, but he seems a bit too stupid for this elaborate of a deception and, since he has so few followers, and his followers are even lacking more brain cells than he is, it is unlikely that he is willfully deceiving.
What of his Bishop? His Bishop is definitely not intellectually deficient, but he simply just does not appear to care. He does not seem to care if his followers are validly baptized, if he closes their parishes, if his followers deny the faith, etc... - so long as he has his little church with his family in KY, it seems all is well in his world.